Evaluation and Assessment
EVALUATION
CHECKLIST
Check the statements that identify the
tasks you have completed prior to submitting your work for consideration.
-
I used at least two different Internet
search engines to locate sites.
-
I found at least two good Internet sites
for each major activity I included in my itineraries.
-
I considered specific characteristics of
clients before creating my itineraries.
-
I included reasonable time frames for all
activities listed in the itineraries.
-
I provided accurate (or at least reasonable)
costs for all activities (i.e. admission fees) and for all forms of transportation.
-
My accomodation costs are accurate (or
at least reasonable given the information I found).
-
I worked well with group members, offering
suggestions, insights, comparisons, predictions,etc.
-
I supported group members well, providing
encouragement, praise and assistance when appropriate.
-
I accepted and completed my share of the
work.
-
I acknowledged all of my Internet sources
in proper form.
-
I assessed information; I did not simply
accept it.
-
I made appropriate judgments concerning
which of the sites to use for my written and verbal report.
-
I managed my time effectively.
-
I completed all tasks within the time frames
established by me, my partner and my facilitator.
-
I demonstrated leadership while working
on the assignment.
-
I asked for help or clarification when
I needed to but displayed considerable independence in learning.
-
I used proper conventions of language in
my written work.
-
I effectively compared and contrasted the
two itineraries.
-
I accepted ownership of the assignment
and designed the itineraries accordingly.
-
The final products (written work and oral
presentation outline) demonstrate creativity, analytical thinking skills,
professionalism, and pride.
Top of Page
SELF
ASSESSMENT
Answer the following questions:
-
What specific strengths assisted you in
completing the assignment?
-
What was your least favourite task associated
with "Voyage of Discovery"? Explain.
-
Explain the knowledge and skills you acquired
as a result of doing the assignment?
-
If you were given the opportunity to do
the assignment over, what would you do differently in:
a. the written work
b. the presentation
c. collaborating with your partner(s)
Connect the assignment with your learning
in:
a. this course
b. other courses you are taking
c. life
Establish new personal learning
goals in this course.
Top
of Page
PEER-TEACHER
EVALUATION FOR PRESENTATION
ORGANIZATION
BELOW STANDARD
-
unorganized
-
unprepared presentation
-
ideas lack coherence
APPROACHING STANDARD
-
acceptable level of organization and preparation
-
ideas are sometimes connected
AT STANDARD
-
very good preparation and organization
of material
-
ideas are coherent; transitions are smooth
ABOVE STANDARD
-
material is extremely well organized
-
preparation is extensive
-
ideas are coherent and sophisticated
USE OF AIDS, SEARCH
ENGINES AND LINKS
BELOW STANDARD
-
did not use search engines
-
few or no links used
-
models, charts, graphics, etc. missing
in presentation
APPROACHING STANDARD
-
used only one search engine
-
used adequate aids and links
AT STANDARD
-
used at least two search engines
-
very good use of aids and links
ABOVE STANDARD
-
used more than two search engines
-
outstanding use of aids and links
KNOWLEDGE OF TOPIC
BELOW STANDARD
-
very little knowledge of topic
-
itineraries lack detail
-
few higher-order thinking skills demonstrated
(synthesis, evaluation, comparative analysis, etc.)
APPROCHING STANDARD
-
some knowledge of topic demonstrated
-
intineraries contain some detail
-
some higher-order thinking skills demonstrated
AT STANDARD
-
Good knowlegde of topic demonstrated
-
itineraries contain some interesting detail
-
high-order thinking skills demonstrated
ABOVE STANDARD
-
sophisticated knowledge of topic
-
highly detailed itineraries
-
outstanding use of higher-order thinking
skills
PRESENTATION
BELOW STANDARD
-
dull, boring presentation
-
no variety in resources or in teaching
strategies
-
audience is disinterested
APPROACHING STANDARD
-
somewhat interesting presentation
-
adequate use of resources and strategies
-
audience is partially engaged
AT STANDARD
-
very interesting presentation
-
very good use of resources and strategies
-
audience is involved
ABOVE STANDARD
-
outstanding presentation
-
great variety of strategies and resources
-
audience is totally involved and engaged
Top of Page
PRODUCT
AND PROCESS EVALUATION-WRITTEN WORK
PRODUCT EVALUATION
-
Originality and Creativity
-
Clarity and Focus
-
Attention to Detail
-
Sophistication of Content
-
Organization of Ideas
-
Presentation of Material
-
Value to and Impact on Readers
-
Writing Style, Grammar and Spelling
-
Transitions Between Ideas
PROCESS EVALUATION
-
Understanding What is Required
-
Identifying Problems
-
Problem-Solving Strategies
-
Appropriateness of Resources
-
Collaborating with Partner(s)
-
Organizing Time Appropriately
-
Managing Tasks Effectively
-
Committment of Time and Effort
-
Accessing Help
RATING SCALE
4--Outstanding
3--Above Average
2--Average
1--Below Average
0--Not Done
Ideas Adapted from: Midwood, D.,
O'Connor, K. and Simpson, K. (1994)
Assess for Success: Assessment,
Evaluation and Reporting for Successful
Learning. Toronto: Educational
Services Committee, OSSTF.
Top of Page
Return
to Main Page
1.Introduction
to the Lesson 2.Learning
Outcomes 3.Guidelines
for Presentations 4.Learning
Materials and Resources
5.Facilitating
and Adapting to Learner Levels
6.Evaluation
of the Lesson/ Assessment 7.Where
to Go From Here 8.Constructing
in Collaboration